Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880447›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Adaptive or maladaptive music-listening coping strategy: How does neuroticism use music after experiencing a romantic relationship breakup?

Hanwei He, Shu Chen, Cheng Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanwei HeFaculty of Music, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1823-4193
Shu ChenFaculty of Music and Dance, China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1029-0887
Cheng HuaGraduate School of Teaching, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-5801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Romantic relationship breakups are common experiences among young people and are associated with negative emotions that can jeopardize psychological well-being. Additionally, those with higher neuroticism may have greater emotional sensitivity towards the impact of music, as they tend to exhibit more negative and unstable emotional traits. As a result, they may be more inclined to control emotions by using music as a coping strategy. However, existing literature has rarely explored the differential roles of adaptive and maladaptive music-listening coping, as well as the mechanisms linking neuroticism and negative emotions associated with romantic breakups. To fill these gaps, the current study recruited 389 college students who had experienced at least one romantic breakup lasting two months or longer within the past five years. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing relevant variables. Correlational analyses indicated that neuroticism and negative emotions related to romantic breakups were positively correlated with maladaptive music-listening coping. Conversely, neuroticism was negatively correlated with adaptive music-listening coping, while no discernible connection between adaptive music listening coping and negative emotions evoked by romantic breakups. Structural equation modeling suggested that neuroticism predicted emotional response to breakups through maladaptive music-listening coping, rather than adaptive music-listening coping. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalInterpersonal RelationsMusicNeuroticismAdolescentAdultCoping SkillsEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40880447
PMCPMC12396676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.