ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Point of care ultrasound evaluation of cardio-cerebral coupling.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardio-cerebral coupling (CCC) refers to the dynamic interplay between cardiac function and cerebral blood flow, essential for maintaining hemodynamic stability. Disruptions in CCC are particularly relevant in critical care, where they can exacerbate primary and secondary brain injuries. Ultrasound-based techniques, including transcranial Doppler, transcranial color-coded Doppler, and echocardiography, provide non-invasive methods to assess this relationship at the bedside. This scoping review explores the pathophysiology of CCC, ultrasound methodologies for its evaluation, and its clinical relevance. Key mechanisms such as cerebral autoregulation and neurovascular coupling are discussed, along with ultrasound-derived parameters like pulsatility index, resistance index, and cerebral perfusion pressure. While ultrasound is a valuable tool, its limitations include operator dependency and equipment variability. Emerging evidence suggests that ultrasound-guided protocols, including ultrasound-guided cardio-cerebral resuscitation protocol and ultrasound-guided brain injury treatment protocol, may improve resuscitation strategies and neurocritical care monitoring. Despite its potential, further research is necessary to standardize assessment methods and integrate ultrasound-based CCC evaluation into routine clinical practice. Ongoing multicenter studies are expected to provide robust evidence supporting its clinical utility in managing brain-injured patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.