SynthesisFrontiers in medical technology2025
Cooling devices used to avoid warm ischemia time injury during kidney transplantation. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond rewarming time: graft thermometry and cooling technologies in robot-assisted kidney transplantation-a scoping review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Warm ischemia during kidney transplantation contributes to graft dysfunction. External cooling devices have been developed to preserve graft during anastomosis, with promising results in experimental models. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of renal cooling devices. Methods: A comprehensive search of seven databases was performed from inception to January 6, 2023. Eligible studies were randomized, prospective, and included a control group. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023409480). Results: All studies reported significantly lower reperfusion temperatures in kidneys treated with cooling devices compared to controls. Histological graft injury, showed no statistically significant difference (SMD -0.95; 95% CI -10.74 to 8.83). However, post-transplant urinary output was significantly higher in the cooling device groups (SMD 0.49; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.88). Discussion: The overall risk of bias across included studies was high. Cooling devices effectively lower graft temperature and may improve early functional outcomes. However, evidence of histological benefit remains inconclusive. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm efficacy and standardize device implementation in human transplantation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023409480, PROSPERO CRD42023409480.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.