Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880736›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Unveiling the perfect workout: exercise modalities and dosages to ameliorate adipokine dysregulation in individuals with overweight and obesity: a systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses.

Hai Wang, Hao Wang, Enyan Zhan, Xiaodong Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hai WangCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Hao WangCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Enyan ZhanCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Xiaodong LiuCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity is commonly associated with dysregulation of adipokines, particularly characterized by elevated leptin levels and reduced adiponectin levels. These abnormalities are closely linked to an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular diseases, and certain cancers. Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of different exercise modalities-AE, RT, COM, HIIT-and their dosages on the regulation of adipokines (leptin and adiponectin) in individuals with overweight and obesity. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and January 2025. A random-effects Bayesian model was applied to perform pairwise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and dose-response meta-analysis to compare the effects of various exercise interventions and their respective doses. Additionally, meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore potential moderating effects of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and body fat percentage on the intervention outcomes. Results: A total of 61 RCTs involving 3,069 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed that all exercise interventions significantly increased adiponectin levels, with HIIT yielding the most pronounced effect (SMD = 0.85, 95% CrI: 0.24-1.45; SUCRA = 68%), followed by RT, AE, and COM. For leptin levels, COM was the most effective intervention (SMD = -0.99, 95% CrI: -1.48 to -0.51; SUCRA = 84%), followed by AE and HIIT, while RT did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect. Dose-response analysis indicated an inverted U-shaped relationship between exercise and improvements in adiponectin, with the optimal effective dose around 880 MET-min/week. In contrast, a negative linear relationship was observed between exercise and leptin, with notable improvements starting at approximately 770 MET-min/week. The dose-response relationships varied by exercise type. Meta-regression further revealed that age and BMI were positively associated with improvements in adiponectin, while BMI and body fat percentage were positively correlated with improvements in leptin. However, age was negatively associated with changes in leptin. No significant moderating effect of sex was observed on changes in adipokine levels. Conclusion: This study provides moderate-quality evidence supporting the effectiveness of HIIT, COM, and AE in improving adipokine profiles among individuals with overweight and obesity, although the effects differ by exercise modality. The well-defined dose-response relationships underscore the importance of individualized exercise prescriptions, with moderate to high weekly doses (approximately 800-1,300 MET-min/week) recommended to optimize endocrine and metabolic health. Future research should further investigate inter-individual variability in response to exercise interventions and their long-term clinical benefits. Systematic review registration: CRD420251010709, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

Indexed as

adipokineadiponectinexerciseleptinmeta-analysisobesityoverweight

Identifiers

PMID40880736
PMCPMC12381787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.