ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Impact of early enteral nutrition on the prognosis of mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV Database.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While early enteral nutrition (EN) is recommended for critically ill patients, its specific impact on mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients remains uncertain. Methods: We analyzed data extracted from the MIMIC-IV 3.0 database, focusing on patients with COPD who received invasive mechanical ventilation. The cohort was stratified into two groups: the early EN group (EEN, EN initiated within 48 h of ICU admission), and the delayed EN group (DEN, EN initiated after 48 h of ICU admission). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between the groups, enabling a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes. Results: Among 1,052 patients, 513 (48.76%) were in the early EN group and 539 (51.24%) were in the delayed EN group. After PSM, no statistically significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality (30.51% vs. 32.82%, Conclusion: Although early EN did not significantly improve overall mortality, it effectively decreased ventilation duration and hospital stays and demonstrated potential survival benefits for patients with better oxygenation. These findings provide critical evidence for optimizing nutritional support strategies in mechanically ventilated COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.