ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Pathway analysis of nursing interns' professional benefit perception and influencing factors: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mediating effect of psychological capital on the relationship between work engagement and perceived professional benefits among nursing interns: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Future work self-salience and perceived professional benefits among nursing interns in China: the indirect roles of clinical belongingness and deep acting in a cross-sectional structural equation modeling study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to examine the current professional benefit perception among nursing interns and explore their interactions with perspective taking, compassion satisfaction, and secondary traumatic stress. Background: The professional benefit perception is a crucial determinant in the career decisions of nursing interns. Understanding the pathways through which various factors influence this perception can inform the development of targeted intervention strategies. Such strategies are essential for preventing the attrition of nursing professionals and addressing the shortage of nursing human resources. Design: A cross-sectional design. Methods: Cross-sectional data were obtained from Inner Mongolia, China. To examine the influencing factors and pathways, multiple linear regression and the Hayes PROCESS macro were employed. Results: The study encompassed 427 nursing interns, whose perception of professional benefits was assessed at a moderate to high level, with a mean score of 4.29 ± 0.61. This perception was significantly affected by perspective taking ( Conclusion: The professional benefit perception among nursing interns is shaped by a multitude of factors. Consequently, clinical educators should consider integrating these multidimensional factors to develop precise intervention programs aimed at enhancing professional identity and supporting the development of nursing talent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.