ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Fishbone ingestion is a non-negligible cause of intestinal perforation.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fish out of the Meckel diverticulum, foreign body bowel perforation: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- CT highly suspected fish bone-induced gastric perforation, but no foreign body was identified intraoperatively: a report of three cases.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical experiences of 109 children with foreign body ingestion: a retrospective study from Kunming, China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Occult fish bone ingestion inducing cross-site injury: a rare case report of gastric bleeding and jejunal perforation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Fish bone foreign body causing rectal, uterine, and bladder perforation: a rare case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion (FBI) is considered a widespread global health concern, with fishbone ingestion (FI) occurring frequently. However, fishbone-induced intestinal perforation (FIIP) remains rare and is frequently overlooked in the initial differential diagnosis. A case involving a 39-year-old patient presenting with acute abdominal pain was diagnosed as FIIP. Initial laparoscopic surgery was followed by a laparotomy for fishbone removal, resulting in a favorable patient recovery. The existing literature on FIIP is reviewed in this article. Reported cases underscore the necessity of prompt identification of the perforation's cause and the critical role of thorough medical history-taking. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography are considered essential diagnostic tools in confirming the condition. While ultrasonography serves as a rapid, non-invasive preliminary examination, CT is regarded as more accurate and comprehensive. In regions with high fish consumption, FIIP should be considered in adult patients, especially the elderly. Retained fishbones may result in serious complications and should be removed whenever feasible. Clinical education is considered vital in minimizing delays in diagnosis and treatment. The least invasive treatment strategy should be selected according to the patient's clinical status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.