ArticleCureus2025
Factors That Predict Endoscopic Evaluation and Gastrostomy Placement in Patients With Neurologic Disorders and Dysphagia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough patients with neurologic disorders commonly develop dysphagia, there remains little consensus on the role of initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or temporal guidance on gastrostomy placement. We aimed to characterize the predictors associated with EGD and gastrostomy recommendation at the initial gastroenterology consultation in patients with progressive neurologic disorders.
methodsThis retrospective study spanned from December 31, 2010, to December 31, 2021, and included patients with both dysphagia and neurologic disorders. Multivariate logistic regression determined the predictors for EGD and gastrostomy recommendation after the initial visit.
resultsOut of 273 patients, EGD was recommended for 163 (59.7%) at the initial evaluation. A diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (odds ratio: 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.52; P=0.001) and being referred by a neurologist (odds ratio: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17-0.84; P<0.02) were the negative predictors of an initial EGD recommendation. Gastrostomy was recommended for 38 patients (13.9%) at the initial consultation. Dysphagia to both liquids and solids, body mass index, diagnosis of ALS, and clinical frailty scale scores were associated with gastrostomy (P≤0.01). A model of six variables had high predictive accuracy for EGD recommendation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.7741).
conclusionsThis study proposes a predictive model for initial EGD recommendation. We suggest that when considered in conjunction with the predictive clinical features of ALS diagnosis and dysphagia to both solids and liquids, the clinical frailty scale and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system scores may help clinicians anticipate gastrostomy when applied to patients with any neurologic disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.