ArticleCureus2025
Physicians' Perception of Telemedicine Use for Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder at the Mental Health Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by difficulties in social interaction, communication, and the presence of repetitive behaviors. The increasing prevalence of ASD highlights the critical need for early diagnosis and tailored, long-term management.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the expectations, perceived benefits, and barriers related to telemedicine among physicians and psychiatric residents at the Mental Health Hospital.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the Mental Health Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, including all affiliated physicians and psychiatric residents through total population sampling. Data were collected using a secure, self-administered online questionnaire, which incorporated the validated Telemedicine Expectations Questionnaire (TEQ) to assess expectations, perceived benefits, and barriers to telemedicine. Appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics were used, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsThe study involved 49 physicians aged 21-30, with a nearly equal gender distribution. Junior residents were the largest professional group at 34.69% (n=17). More than half of the participants agreed that telemedicine is a useful tool for diagnosing ASD (n=25, 51.02%) and for communicating diagnoses to families (n=22, 44.90%). However, fewer participants supported its use for treatment (n=17, 34.69%) or as a routine diagnostic tool (n=15, 30.61%). The most recognized benefits included improving parenting skills (n=29, 59.18%), saving time (n=22, 44.90%), and increasing care flexibility (n=24, 48.98%). Reported barriers involved poor internet connection (n=25, 51.02%), difficulty tracking children during sessions (n=20, 40.82%), and the child's embarrassment (n=29, 59.18%). No significant associations were found except for benefits, which varied by experience (p=0.037).
conclusionTelemedicine has become a viable alternative to traditional treatments, especially during public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted in-person care. Despite challenges such as limited internet access, tele-assessments align closely with conventional evaluations, and parent-mediated tele-interventions have been shown to improve communication and social skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.