ArticleJournal of advanced research2026
The therapeutic value of "Bile Transfer" for complications of acute pancreatitis: A retrospective clinical study.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases, imposing a significant burden on patients, with its incidence steadily increasing worldwide. Despite a drop in fatality rates, AP-related complications remain high, impacting prognosis.
objectivesThis retrospective clinical study introduces the concept of "bile transfer" (BT) and explores its potential in reducing AP-related complications.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated 344 AP patients with gallbladder distension at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2024. Patients were classified into three groups: percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) + bile reinfusion (BT group), PTGD-alone, and conventional treatment to assess complication rates. Logistic regression identified independent risk factors for treatment outcomes. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed to identify optimal indications for BT.
resultsAmong the 344 patients, the incidence of new complications in the BT group was 21.50 %, significantly lower than in the PTGD-alone (46.59 %) and conventional treatment groups (54.36 %) (p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified Total bilirubin (TBIL), Ca
conclusionThis study introduces BT and shows that PTGD combined with bile reinfusion significantly reduces complications in AP patients. We identified optimal indications and predictors for BT. These findings are clinically important for improving AP patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.