ArticleScientific reports2025
An attention-based mRNA transformer network for accurate prediction of melanoma response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Resistance in Melanoma: Molecular Mechanisms and Emerging Pharmaceutical Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Melanoma immunotherapy urgently requires approaches that can accurately predict drug responses to minimize unnecessary treatments. Deep learning models have emerged as powerful tools in this domain due to their robust predictive capabilities. Integrating functional characteristics with expression data from mRNA transcripts shows promise for enhancing prediction accuracy. We developed a deep learning model called AMU (Attention mechanism Model for melanoma immUnotherapy) that incorporates a self-attention mechanism to predict clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients based on mRNA expression profiles. We evaluated AMU's performance against established machine learning approaches including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and classical Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). In the validation set (pre-treatment tissue samples), AMU exhibited outstanding performance, with an AUC of 0.941 and an mAP of 0.960. In the test set (post-treatment tissue samples), its AUC was 0.672, and the mAP was 0.800. Model interpretation revealed that the TNF-TNFRSF1A pathway was a crucial pathway influencing the efficacy of melanoma immunotherapy. Additionally, the expression levels of CD80 and CCR3 were closely correlated with the survival rate (hazard ratios of 0.761 and 0.134, respectively) and the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients. The deep learning model integrated with the self-attention mechanism has demonstrated strong efficacy in processing mRNA expression data for melanoma immunotherapy response prediction. After rigorous evaluation, including batch effect correction and cross-validation, AMU achieved superior performance compared to traditional machine learning approaches. Beyond prediction accuracy, our model interpretation work identified the TNF-TNFRSF1A pathway as potentially crucial in determining melanoma ICI response, a finding aligned with recent experimental evidence. The embedding architecture's ability to capture meaningful gene-gene relationships, partially consistent with established protein interaction networks, suggests broad potential for representation learning in transcriptomic analysis. While acknowledging the limitations of current sample sizes and the need for prospective validation, this work provides both methodological advances in applying transformer architectures to gene expression data and biological insights into immunotherapy response mechanisms. The integration of robust machine learning approaches with domain-specific biological knowledge represents a promising direction for developing clinically relevant biomarkers in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.