Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883666›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

General practitioners' educational and training needs and requirements for advising patients with coronary heart disease on physical activity: findings from a qualitative study in Germany.

Alicia Prinz, Sabrina Hoppe, Rik Crutzen, Stefan Wilm, Sabrina Kastaun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicia PrinzInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Patient-Physician-Communication Research Unit, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, P.O. Box 101007, Düsseldorf, 40001, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-8159-7414
Sabrina HoppeInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Patient-Physician-Communication Research Unit, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, P.O. Box 101007, Düsseldorf, 40001, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-1429-3978
Rik CrutzenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3731-6610
Stefan WilmInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Patient-Physician-Communication Research Unit, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, P.O. Box 101007, Düsseldorf, 40001, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1266-5064
Sabrina KastaunInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Patient-Physician-Communication Research Unit, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, P.O. Box 101007, Düsseldorf, 40001, Germany. sabrina.kastaun@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-1135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization and German treatment guidelines emphasise integrating physical activity (PA) advice into primary care of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, this is often inadequately implemented in German general practice. A key barrier may be healthcare professionals' limited knowledge and skills in providing effective and efficient PA guidance - both in general as well as for patients with CHD. International guidelines recommend targeted training for general practitioners (GPs). Understanding GPs' specific educational and training needs is crucial to developing tailored training programmes for improving implementation of advising CHD patients on PA.

methodsBetween March and June 2023, 12 problem-centred one-on-one interviews and six moderated focus groups (n = 37 participants) with GPs were conducted in-person (total N  = 49 GPs, 37% female, mean age 56 years (36-78 years)). Interview and focus group topic guides were developed and pilot-tested by the multi-professional study team. Transcripts from audio-recorded data were analysed using both deductive and inductive content structuring, within a multi-professional team, with active involvement of GPs. This analysis extends a previous study using the same dataset. 

resultsGPs recognise the benefits of PA for CHD patients. Their conceptualisations of PA (e.g., definitions of sport and PA, general statements on PA) vary and the incorporation of PA in everyday activities (e.g., using stairs) to encourage behaviour change is sometimes recommended. GPs identify the following key training needs for providing PA advice to CHD patients: peer exchange and self-reflection, evidence-based knowledge on PA and CHD, practical tools and support materials to facilitate the integration of PA advice into routine practice. These include low-barrier, time-efficient communication techniques, and role-play simulations. 

conclusionThis qualitative study provides insights into GPs' needs and preferences regarding the content, didactics, and organisation of training on PA advice. To enhance competence and foster deeper learning, training should combine evidence-based knowledge with practical elements such as simulations and reflective peer exchange. Building on previous findings about GPs' attitudes and experiences, the identified educational needs offer a foundation for developing tailored training to support PA counselling in routine primary CHD care. This training will be implemented and evaluated in a subsequent study.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseExerciseGeneral PractitionersAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchBrief counsellingChronic ischemic heart diseaseCoronary heart diseaseEducationExerciseGeneral practiceGuidancePrimary careQualitative researchTraining

Identifiers

PMID40883666
PMCPMC12395830

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.