Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884237›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Genetic differences between primary colorectal cancer and its paired synchronous and metachronous metastases.

Marie Rajtmajerova, Filip Ambrozkiewicz, Viktor Hlavac, Andriy Trailin, Lenka Cervenkova, Jan Bruha, Simona Susova, Pavel Soucek, Pavel Vodicka, Ludmila Vodickova and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Marie RajtmajerovaLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7961-1977
Filip AmbrozkiewiczLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6850-780X
Viktor HlavacLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-0552
Andriy TrailinLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-0759
Lenka CervenkovaLaboratory of Cancer Treatment and Tissue Regeneration, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jan BruhaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Simona SusovaLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Pavel SoucekLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Pavel VodickaLaboratory of Cancer Treatment and Tissue Regeneration, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Ludmila VodickovaLaboratory of Cancer Treatment and Tissue Regeneration, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Ondrej KubecekDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Stanislav FilipDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Venkata R MallelaLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Wenjing YeLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Frantisek ZitrickyLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-7143
Vaclav LiskaLaboratory of Cancer Treatment and Tissue Regeneration, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Kari HemminkiLaboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 23-05609S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the second most deadly cancerous disease worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) stands in the center of scientific interest in hope to develop novel approaches for precise diagnostics and prognosis determination. Metastatic disease remains the main cause of CRC mortality. To investigate the underlying genetic differences between CRC patients with synchronous and metachronous liver metastases, we performed whole-exome sequencing of 210 patient samples using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from primary tumors and the paired liver metastatic tissue. The analyses included types and levels of mutations and copy number variation. APC and TP53 were the most commonly mutated genes in all samples with differing frequency between primary CRC (both 50%) and its metachronous metastasis (both 64%). While MPDZ gene mutations were restricted to primary tumors that developed metachronous metastases only, mutations in VCAN, MTCL1, MDN1, SHROOM2, SPEG, and GLI2 were more prevalent in primary tumors giving rise to synchronous metastases. FBN1 mutations were unique to synchronous liver metastatic tissue. Analysis of genetic interactions revealed different associations between mutated genes in patients with tumors of different chronicity, including driver genes such as TP53, which was associated with APC in synchronous patients, while in primary tumors with metachronous metastases it co-occurs with mutations in NBPF11 and PRAMEF15, respectively. The results suggest that distinct tumor progression pathways account for different chronicity outcomes further affecting patients' survival. However, larger studies are needed incorporating transcriptomic and epigenomic data to shed further light on the mechanistic chain from mutations to downstream gene expression regulation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAdultAgedDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosiscolorectal cancermetachronous liver metastasissynchronous liver metastasisWESwhole‐exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40884237
PMCPMC12588547

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.