Trial reportEuropean heart journal2025
High-dose vs. standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the DANFLU-2 trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The benefits of influenza vaccination in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- High-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in older adults with or without cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized trials on 511,890 participants.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Review
- Potential Non-Specific Benefits of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination: Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions.Vaccines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe aim was to evaluate and compare the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) vs. standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccination (SD-IIV) on respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
methodsA prespecified exploratory analysis of a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized trial conducted in Denmark during three influenza seasons. Adults ≥65 years were randomized 1:1 to HD-IIV or SD-IIV. Baseline and outcome data were collected through nationwide registries. The primary outcome was hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke. Heterogeneity in rVE among participants with vs. without ASCVD was assessed.
resultsThe incidence of all outcomes was higher in participants with pre-existing ASCVD (n = 46 825) vs. those without (n = 285 613). rVE was consistent among participants with and without ASCVD (all Pinteraction ≥ .05). The rVE for the primary outcome was 6.87% [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.52 to 15.42] among individuals without ASCVD and 4.71% (95% CI, -11.58 to 18.63) in those with (Pinteraction = .80). For influenza hospitalizations, the rVE was 42.88% (95% CI, 22.07-58.44) vs. 45.73% (95% CI, 16.68-65.16) in those without vs. with ASCVD (Pinteraction = .84). For MACE, the rVE was 4.29% (95% CI, -6.50 to 14.00) in participants without, and 0.30% (95% CI, -17.56 to 15.44) in participants with, pre-existing ASCVD (Pinteraction = .68).
conclusionsAmong individuals ≥65 years, the rVE of HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV against respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes was similar among those with vs. without pre-existing ASCVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.