Evidence mapPaperPMID 40885652Full record

Trial reportSurgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery2025

A technology-based intervention to reduce alcohol use after metabolic and bariatric surgery: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes.

Lisa R Miller-Matero, Celeste Pappas, Brittany Christopher, Roman Grossi, Alyssa Vanderziel, Nancy P Barnett, Roland S Moore, Aaron Hamann, Arthur M Carlin, Oliver A Varban and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa R Miller-MateroHenry Ford Health, Behavioral Health, Detroit, Michigan; Henry Ford Health, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: Lmatero1@hfhs.org.
Celeste PappasHenry Ford Health, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Detroit, Michigan.
Brittany ChristopherHenry Ford Health, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Detroit, Michigan.
Roman GrossiHenry Ford Health, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Detroit, Michigan.
Alyssa VanderzielHenry Ford Health, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Detroit, Michigan.
Nancy P BarnettCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Roland S MoorePacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, California.
Aaron HamannHenry Ford Health, Behavioral Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Arthur M CarlinHenry Ford Health, Department of Surgery, Detroit, Michigan.
Oliver A VarbanHenry Ford Health, Department of Surgery, Detroit, Michigan.
Jordan M BraciszewskiHenry Ford Health, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA027775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are at increased risk for an alcohol use disorder. A technology-based intervention, rooted in motivational interviewing, could broadly reach patients after MBS and has the potential to reduce alcohol use.

objectiveExamine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a technology-based intervention to reduce alcohol use delivered after MBS.

settingHealth system.

methodsParticipants (N = 60) who were 3-18 months post-MBS were randomized to the intervention or treatment-as-usual control group. The tailored intervention consisted of 2 (15-minute) sessions of interactive web-based content followed by 3-months of daily text messaging. Participants completed baseline and a postintervention assessment (91.7% retention).

resultsParticipants were primarily female (90%), White (55.0%) or Black (43.3%), with a mean age of 44.6 years (SD = 10.4). Of those randomized to the intervention (n = 24), 83.3% (n = 20) began the intervention and 95% (n = 19) completed it. The majority of participants rated all intervention components positively and 100% agreed that other patients would use the intervention. The intervention group reported a significant increase in level of motivation to avoid alcohol use from baseline to postintervention (P = .02), whereas the control group did not show a significant change (P = .73). At the postintervention, the intervention group had significantly fewer participants endorsing alcohol use than the control group (43.5% versus 75%; X

conclusionA technology-based intervention delivered after MBS was feasible, acceptable, and showed promising preliminary outcomes for increasing motivation to avoid alcohol use as well as reducing alcohol use.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholismBariatric SurgeryMotivational InterviewingAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPatient Acceptance of Health CareText MessagingTreatment OutcomeAlcohol useInterventionMetabolic and bariatric surgeryMotivational interviewingTechnology

Identifiers

PMID40885652
PMCPMC12413560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.