ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Tumor treating fields alter local coagulation dynamics in glioblastoma patients.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor, associated with hypercoagulability and thrombosis. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), a non-invasive therapy that uses low-intensity, alternating electric fields to disrupt cancer cell division, prolongs survival when used concomitantly with radiochemotherapy. TTFields-treated patients often exhibit distinct recurrence patterns, suggesting a local interaction between TTFields and tumor-associated coagulation, underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study examined coagulation profiles in TTFields-treated patients' blood, tumor cells, and plasma-derived extracellular vesicles using molecular, hemostaseologic, and phenotypic analyses. Our findings revealed that short-term TTFields exposure significantly prolongs blood coagulation in GBM patients and healthy donors by altering tissue factor (TF) expression and disrupting the extrinsic coagulation pathway. TTFields reduced clot rigidity by decreasing Factor II/FXIII activity and platelet count, without impairing fibrinogen function. Patient-derived GBM cells exposed to TTFields exhibited increased TF abundance. RNA-based microarray analysis of GBM cells confirmed coagulation-related changes, including upregulation of platelet adhesion marker ITGA2, and downregulation of THBS1, a regulator of clotting, platelet aggregation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and tumor invasiveness. Additionally, TXNIP, a coagulation-modulating gene, was downregulated after TTFields exposure, indicating a link to immune regulation in the tumor microenvironment. In an allogeneic co-culture model of patient-derived GBM cells and peripheral blood, TTFields modulated coagulation and immune responses, likely by rebalancing pro- and anticoagulant factors in the tumor microenvironment, reducing the prothrombotic state, and altering inflammatory pathways. These findings provide insights into how TTFields influence coagulation and, eventually, immune regulation, offering strategies to optimize clinical decision-making and mitigating thromboembolic complications in GBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.