ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterization of cervical fluid Ureaplasma species in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm delivery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of premature rupture of fetal membranes using deep learning in East China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ureaplasma spp., commonly identified in the vagina/cervix of pregnant women with spontaneous preterm delivery, are the most frequently detected microorganisms in amniotic fluid. To date, 14 U. spp. serotypes have been characterized; however, modern molecular biology methods can distinguish different U. spp genotypes. Considering these factors, a knowledge gap exists regarding the association between U. spp. genotypes and the risk of the ascension of U. spp. from the cervix to the amniotic cavity. To fill this gap, an expanded multilocus sequence-typing scheme of U. spp. was performed to assess the relationship between cervical and amniotic fluid U. spp. in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm delivery. This study included 109 and 69 pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labor (PTL) and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), respectively. U. spp. DNA in cervical fluid was identified in 49% and 55% of the women with PTL and PPROM, respectively. The concurrent presence of U. spp. DNA in amniotic fluid was observed in 17% and 59% of the pregnant women with PTL and PPROM, respectively. Among pregnant women with PTL and PPROM, 38 expanded sequence types of cervical U. spp. were identified. No associations were observed between specific genotypes, subgroups, or clusters of cervical U. spp. and the presence of amniotic fluid U. spp. in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.