Evidence mapPaperPMID 40885772Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

An ultra-wide-field fundus image dataset for intelligent diagnosis of intraocular tumors.

Jie Sun, Xinyu Zhao, Shaobin Chen, Yulin Zhang, Hui Ren, Yue Sun, Guoming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie Sun *Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xinyu Zhao *Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Shaobin Chen *Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao Special Administrative Region of China, Macao, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2306-1856
Yulin ZhangShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Hui RenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. rhui@sina.com.
Yue SunFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao Special Administrative Region of China, Macao, China. yuesun@mpu.edu.mo.
Guoming ZhangShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China. zhangguoming@sz-eyes.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82271103National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82401315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal fundus photographs are now widely used in developing artificial intelligence (AI) systems for the detection of various fundus diseases. However, the application of AI algorithms in intraocular tumors remains limited due to the scarcity of large, publicly available, and diverse multi-disease fundus image datasets. Ultra-wide-field (UWF) fundus images, with a broad imaging range, offer unique advantages for early detection of intraocular tumors. In this study, we developed a comprehensive dataset containing 2,031 UWF fundus images, encompassing five distinct types of intraocular tumors and normal images. These images were classified by three expert annotators to ensure accurate labeling. This dataset aims to provide a robust, multi-disease, real-world data source to facilitate the development and validation of AI models for the early diagnosis and classification of intraocular tumors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEye NeoplasmsFundus OculiDatasets as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID40885772
PMCPMC12398491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.