Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885926›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Environmental impact of food consumption and sociodemographic factors in Northern Norway through an intersectional lens: a cross-sectional study.

Bahar Kucuk, Charlotta Rylander, Monica Hauger Carlsen, Marie Wasmuth Lundblad, Lene Frost Andersen, Guri Skeie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bahar KucukDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens Veg 18, Tromsø, 9019, Norway. bahar.kucuk@uit.no.
Charlotta RylanderDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens Veg 18, Tromsø, 9019, Norway.
Monica Hauger CarlsenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0316, Norway.
Marie Wasmuth LundbladDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens Veg 18, Tromsø, 9019, Norway.
Lene Frost Andersen *Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0316, Norway.
Guri Skeie *Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens Veg 18, Tromsø, 9019, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood systems contribute significantly to environmental degradation. The interplay of sociodemographic factors influences food choices and thus, the environmental impacts of diet. This study investigated the environmental impact of food consumption in Northern Norway, focusing on intersectional dynamics.

methodsA cross-sectional design was employed using data from the Tromsø Study. The diet was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, and the environmental impacts of the diet were estimated for greenhouse gas emissions, water use, land use, acidification, and eutrophication using a Norwegian life cycle analysis food database. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the associations with sociodemographic variables using three-way interactions with sex, education, and income in an inter-categorical intersectionality framework. Pairwise contrasts were calculated to assess the mean differences between interacting groups.

resultsThe typical diet in Northern Norway substantially impacts the environment, with dairy products being the primary contributor. When controlling for energy intake, age was inversely linked to the environmental impact, whereas a higher body mass index corresponded to a greater environmental impact. No clear association with sex was observed, and the associations among environmental impact, education, and income varied. Including intersectional analyses did not significantly improve the explanatory power of the models. Although a few pairwise comparisons were statistically significant, the effect sizes were generally small.

conclusionThe study underscores the complex dynamics of dietary habits and sociodemographic factors in shaping the environmental impact of food consumption. The findings are important to develop approaches that balance sustainability perspectives and the diverse needs of the population in Northern Norway.

Indexed as

DietEnvironmentFeeding BehaviorAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwaySociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesEnvironmental impactFood consumptionIntersectionalityNorwaySustainable diet

Identifiers

PMID40885926
PMCPMC12398146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.