Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885968›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Factors associated with female genital mutilation/cutting in Tanzania: insights from Tanzania demographic and health survey 2022.

Tumaini Nyamhanga, Oliva Kapinga, Brian A Muro, Pankras Luoga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tumaini NyamhangaSchool of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and allied Sciences, P.O. Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Oliva KapingaSchool of Nursing, St. Johns University, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Brian A MuroSchool of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and allied Sciences, P.O. Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Pankras LuogaSchool of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and allied Sciences, P.O. Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. luoga.pankras1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, female genital mutilation (FGM) remains a significant public health concern. The practice is disproportionately high in African countries. In Tanzania, FGM poses serious health risks to both women, girls and children. However, there is limited empirical literature on the factors associated with FGM in Tanzania. This study intended to fill the gap.

methodsIn this study, we analysed secondary data from a cross-sectional survey, involving a weighted sample of 7,678 women aged 15-49 from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS). In this study, the binary dependent variable indicates whether the respondent is mutilated or not mutilated while the independent variables include various demographic characteristics of women, such as age, education level, socioeconomic status, and region of residence. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. A threshold of p-value < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was used to determine a statistically significant association.

resultsThe prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2% and types I and II (a cut with or without removal of flesh) were the dominant types of FGM practice by 89.2%. After controlling for other variables, higher odds of being mutilated was reported in; older ages 45-49 years (adjusted Odds Ratio(aOR));3.09, 95%CI: 1.72, 5.54), in rural areas (aOR;2.30, 95%CI:1.4,3.6), in women in unions (aOR;1.60, 95%CI:1.20,2.10), in Northern zone (aOR;9.10, 95%CI: 4.60, 17.80), those who ever heard about FGM had 2.27 times (aOR; 2.27, 95%CI: 0.82, 6.29), those who said FGM required by religion had 8.3 times (aOR; 8.30, 95%CI: 4.30,16.03), those who supported FGM had 5.29 times (aOR; 5.29, 95%CI: 2.69, 10.40) higher odds of reporting having undergone FGM compared to those who said the practice should be stopped. Conversely, lower odds of experiencing FGM was reported in; women with at least secondary education (aOR;0.40, 95%CI:0.20,0.60), those from richest households (aOR;0.40, 95%CI: 0.20, 0.60) and those who said distance to a health facility was not a big problem (aOR;0.70, 95%CI: 0.50, 0.90).

conclusionOur study found that prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2%. The factors associated with experiencing FGM included woman's socio-demographic factors like older age, rural residency, lower or no education, poorest wealth quintile, supporting FGM to continue and being in unions. This calls for collaborative efforts between the government and other stakeholders to design targeted interventions as ending FGM require a multisectoral approach addressing aforementioned determinants across multiple levels including education and wealth creation programs particularly to uneducated and poorest women from rural areas.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsTanzaniaYoung AdultDHSFemale genital mutilationTanzaniaWomen

Identifiers

PMID40885968
PMCPMC12398043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.