Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40886064›Full record

ReviewNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2025

Implementation science in nutrition practice: A review of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Bridve Sivakumar, Jordan Mak, Salma Bafagih, JoAnne Arcand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implementation science in nutrition practice: A review of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bridve SivakumarFaculty of Health Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jordan MakToronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Salma BafagihFaculty of Health Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
JoAnne ArcandFaculty of Health Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1995-6905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many nutrition interventions and innovations are supported by strong evidence; however, their adoption, implementation, and long-term sustainability in real-world healthcare settings too frequently remain a challenge. Implementation science offers methodologies to equip practitioners with tools to identify and address the contextual factors that influence implementation success in health settings (e.g., adoption, implementation, sustainability). Among the various frameworks and theories used in implementation science, the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most widely used. The CFIR synthesizes constructs from multiple behavioral and implementation theories into a comprehensive tool that can be used to systematically assess the barriers and facilitators that influence implementation outcomes. The framework enables practitioners and researchers to identify context-specific implementation determinants and to design tailored implementation strategies across diverse contexts and settings. Given its adaptability, the CFIR is highly relevant to the field of nutrition and dietetics to support sustained adoption and delivery of nutrition innovations (e.g., screening tools, educational programs, quality improvement initiatives); but it is relatively underutilized in nutrition practice. This article provides an overview of the CFIR and illustrates how it can be used to guide the implementation of nutrition innovations in clinical practice through two pragmatic case studies. We highlight the potential of the CFIR to be used as a guiding framework to advance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of nutrition innovations and improve nutrition care and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

DieteticsImplementation ScienceNutritional SciencesNutrition TherapyHumansconsolidated framework for implementation sciencedietdietary interventionsimplementation sciencenutrition

Identifiers

PMID40886064
PMCPMC12590315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.