ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Hidden findings: How often does Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) uncover prostate cancer?
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition with an increasing prevalence that parallels aging. Surgical procedures involving removal of the prostate can lead to detection of incidental prostate cancer (iPCa). Following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), the incidence of such cases ranges from 5.6 to 23.3%. This study aims to provide a contemporary incidence of iPCa at HoLEP and associated risk factors.
methodsA multi-national retrospective cohort analysis of 579 patients who underwent HoLEP between 2021 and 2024 was performed. Prior to HoLEP, MRI was performed in 115 (20%) patients, of which 19 were diagnosed with PCa via conventional biopsy and were excluded from analysis. Clinical, demographic, and radiologic parameters were queried to determine association with iPCa and rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
resultsOf 560 HoLEP patients, 39 (7.0%) were found to have de novo PCa, of which 13 (2.3%) had csPCa at the time of surgery. Patients with iPCa were more likely to be of white race (59% vs 29%, p < 0.001), ASA Grade 3/4 (41% vs 22%, p < 0.001), and higher preoperative mean PSA (5.7 vs 4 ng/dl, p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, only white race (OR: 1.29, p = 0.04) and HoLEP morcellation time (OR: 0.91, p = 0.03) were associated with iPCa diagnosis.
conclusionsIn an international HoLEP cohort, de novo PCa was detected in 7.0% of patients, with only 2.3% harboring clinically significant (≥ GG2) disease. Higher proportions of white men, men with ASA 3/4, and higher preoperative mean PSA were observed in iPCa. These data are valuable for appropriate preoperative patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.