ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
Identification and validation of prognostic genes associated with mitochondrial nuclear genes in gastric cancer.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- LINC01614 favors breast cancer progression through the regulation of miR-217/FN1 and mediation in PI3K/AKT signal pathway.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- Identification the Tumor Mechanics-Related Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitochondrial-related nuclear genes (MNGs) have shown great importance in cancer diagnosis and prognosis, but their role in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. GC-related transcriptome data from the gene expression omnibus and cancer genome atlas databases were analyzed to identify differentially expressed MNGs. A prognostic risk model was constructed through univariate Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, validated by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve and receiver operating characteristic curve. This was followed by immune infiltration analysis, independent prognostic analysis, functional enrichment analysis, drug sensitivity analysis, drug prediction, molecular docking and construction of regulatory networks. Three prognostic genes (ATP8A2, COX15 and TARS2) were identified. The expression of TARS2 and COX15 was positively correlated with CNV, while ATP8A2 was unaffected. The risk model and nomogram, integrating risk score and clinicopathological factors, exhibited excellent predictive performance. A significant correlation was observed between prognostic genes and differential immune cells, such as T cells, B cells, and NK cells. BMS-754807, Gefitinib, JQ1, Lapatinib, and Sapitinib exhibited significant differences in sensitivity between the high-risk group and the low-risk group. The results of molecular docking showed TP8A2 has stable binding ability with cytosine, COX15 with indomethacin, and TARS2 with bisacodyl. RT-qPCR revealed downregulation of ATP8A2 and upregulation of COX15 and TARS2 in GC samples. MNGs, including ATP8A2, COX15, and TARS2, demonstrated significant associations with immune infiltration, CNV, and prognostic outcomes of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.