ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2025
Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05367674 (Summer Harvest Adventure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Summer Harvest Adventure: A Garden-based Obesity Prevention Program for Children Residing in Low-resource Communities
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metaproteomic analysis offers critical insights into gut microbiome function; however, efficient microbial protein extraction from fecal samples remains challenging due to the complexity of different types of bacterial cell walls in the microbiome. In this study, we systematically compared three representative detergent-based lysis buffers (sodium dodecyl sulfate_urea, dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea, sodium dodecyl sulfate_ dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea) for metaproteomics sample preparation. After multiple levels of analyses, we identified SDS_DDM_urea as the most efficient option for extracting diverse microbial proteins, peptides, and identifying microbial species. Applying this optimized method to samples from a community based dietary intervention study (Summer Harvest Adventure), we found minimal group-level microbial diversity shifts during this type of intervention, but substantial individual-specific variations reflected by metaproteomics results. Functional analyses also revealed microbial protein changes, especially proteins related to metabolic adaptations, including enhanced carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, vitamin transport, and increased expression of membrane-associated proteins. Our results highlighted the personalized microbiome response to dietary interventions and underscored the importance of selecting appropriate protein extraction methods to accurately capture microbiome functional dynamics in microbiome analyses via metaproteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.