Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887988›Full record

Observational studyEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Coronary microvascular disease in patients referred to coronary angiography following coronary computed tomography angiography.

Jelmer Westra, Laust Dupont Rasmussen, Salma Raghad Karim, Rebekka Viberg Jensen, June Anita Ejlersen, Lars Christian Gormsen, Morten Bøttcher, Ashkan Eftekhari, Simon Winther, Evald Høj Christiansen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jelmer WestraDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Laust Dupont RasmussenDepartment of Cardiology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Salma Raghad KarimDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rebekka Viberg JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
June Anita EjlersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lars Christian GormsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten BøttcherDepartment of Cardiology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Ashkan EftekhariDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Simon WintherDepartment of Cardiology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Evald Høj ChristiansenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIschaemia without obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) is common and is often related to coronary microvascular disease (CMD). Previous studies primarily focused on functional assessment in patients with established ischaemia without obstructive epicardial CAD.

aimsWe sought to assess the prevalence of CMD and compare clinical and procedural characteristics including myocardial perfusion imaging, as derived from rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (

methodsWe conducted a prospective, observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive epicardial CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography. All patients were referred to

resultsAmong 561 patients, isolated CMD was diagnosed in 131 patients (prevalence 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.27). Vessel territories with isolated CMD were characterised by similar perfusion characteristics to non-diseased vessels (mean difference in hyperaemic myocardial blood flow 0.03 [95% CI: -0.13 to 0.06] mL/min/g). Patients with isolated epicardial disease on both patient and vessel levels had reduced stress myocardial blood flow compared to patients without disease. The probability of being angina-free at 3 months tended to be lower for the CMD group (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31-1.00) and higher for the revascularised epicardial disease group (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 0.94-2.48) compared to the group classified as not diseased.

conclusionsCMD, as identified with bolus thermodilution, is common in patients referred to invasive coronary angiography based on suspected obstructive epicardial CAD even in patients with normal stress myocardial blood flow by

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseAgedCoronary CirculationFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRubidium RadioisotopesRubidium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID40887988
PMCPMC12378605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.