Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40888147›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Smart Rings in Remote Monitoring at Home: Older Patients' Perceptions and Expectations.

Melika Azim Zadegan, Eeva Aromaa, Tero Montonen, Rosa Sahlström, Päivi Eriksson, Ville Leinonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Smart Rings in Remote Monitoring at Home: Older Patients' Perceptions and Expectations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melika Azim ZadeganBusiness School, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3748-008X
Eeva AromaaBusiness School, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0735-1562
Tero MontonenBusiness School, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Rosa SahlströmNeurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Päivi ErikssonBusiness School, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-1165
Ville LeinonenNeurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

This study was conducted in cooperation with the Doctoral Programme in Neuro-Innovation (The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions co-fund number 101034307), at the University of Eastern Finland Business School, Kuopio University Hospital VTR fund (Grant number 5252614), the Research Council of Finland (Grant numbers 339767 and 348202), the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and the Strategic Neuroscience Funding of the University of Eastern Finland.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a limited understanding of how older patients perceive the potential of using wearables for remote monitoring (RM) at home. Exploring patients' perspectives prior to the implementation of wearables in healthcare can offer valuable insights into what may enhance the effectiveness and outcomes of RM.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to explore the expectations of older patients with a susceptible chronic illness towards prospective use of the Oura Ring for health monitoring at home. Unlike previous research, which primarily addresses patients' experiences during or after RM has taken place, we explored their perspective before the use.

methodsHealthcare professionals identified the 10 study participants among those who were undergoing a diagnostic procedure for the chronic neurological disease iNPH at the Kuopio University Hospital in Finland. All invited patients consented to participate. Qualitative interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke.

findingsPatients expected Oura to support both health and broader well-being through self-tracking and proactive health management, presenting themselves as active contributors to their care. Being monitored by healthcare professionals or caregivers was viewed as reassuring, mirroring the increasing digitalisation of healthcare and a reduction in in-person contact.

conclusionThe findings highlight the relevance of approaching older patients with chronic conditions to gauge interest in home-based RM. This emphasises involving the patient perspective early on in RM processes, including decisions about the specific solutions to be used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The second author is a trained patient expert by experience who ensured that the analysis and the findings were grounded in authentic patient perspectives. The findings were shared with the study participants in the form of an information leaflet, the quality of which was ensured by the expert by experience.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesWearable Electronic DevicesAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleFinlandHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicQualitative ResearchTelemedicineageddigital healthinterviewpatientsqualitative researchremote patient monitoringwearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID40888147
PMCPMC12399984

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.