ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
"In Their Own Words": A Qualitative Exploration of Lived Experience and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Evaluating a Digital Intervention for Binge Eating.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing Supported Digital Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Binge Eating Disorder in Routine Care: Mixed Methods Service Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- "In Their Own Words": A Qualitative Exploration of Lived Experience and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Evaluating a Digital Intervention for Binge Eating.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEating disorders characterized by binge eating are prevalent yet under-recognized, limiting access to effective care. The digital, programme-led (self-help) version of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) offers a potentially scalable treatment. This study gathered insights from individuals with lived experience of binge eating (LE) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the intervention's effectiveness and to support early-stage implementation planning.
methodFour focus groups were conducted with 20 participants (8 with LE, 12 HCPs). Discussions explored recruitment strategies, participant engagement, meaningful outcome measures, and barriers to implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsTwo overarching themes were identified: (1) Reach People in Accessible and Supportive Ways, and (2) Be Open to Different Experiences of Progress. Participants emphasized inclusive recruitment and compassionate, hopeful messaging. Stigma and limited recognition of binge eating were cited as recruitment barriers in healthcare settings. Both groups recommended community and online platforms to enhance reach. Participants stressed the importance of outcomes beyond symptom reduction (e.g., emotional well-being) and qualitative methods to capture recovery narratives. Findings also highlighted implementation-relevant factors, including how interventions are framed and delivered, and how engagement can be optimized. DISCUSSION: Perspectives from individuals with LE and HCPs support a person-centred trial aligned with the needs of those experiencing binge eating and those providing care, while considering both evaluative and implementation priorities. Findings inform strategies to enhance reach and understanding of digital intervention outcomes, contributing to trial designs that are consistent with real-world care and meaningful to participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.