ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Generalist Malaria Parasites and Host Imprinting: Unveiling Transcriptional Memory.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generalist parasites must adapt to diverse host environments to ensure their survival and transmission. These adaptations can involve fixed genetic responses, transcriptional plasticity, or epigenetic mechanisms. The avian malaria parasite Plasmodium homocircumflexum offers an ideal model for studying transcriptional variation across hosts. We experimentally inoculated P. homocircumflexum into different bird species, bypassing the vector, to assess whether gene expression remains stable across hosts, resets in response to new environments, or reflects epigenetic inheritance. We tested two alternative hypotheses: (i) universal gene expression profile ("one key fits all"), where parasite expression remains consistent across hosts. Our outcomes revealed that gene expression differed significantly depending on the host species and time postinfection, rejecting this hypothesis. (ii) Transcriptional plasticity, where gene expression is determined by the recipient host. Contrary to this hypothesis, we observed that gene expression was primarily influenced by the donor at 8 d postinfection (dpi), whereas gene expression was more aligned with the recipient host at 16 dpi. We also explored two mechanisms to explain these patterns: (i) epigenetic inheritance, whereby early transcription reflects the donor environment but adjusts over time, and (ii) genetic differentiation selecting for specific haplotypes. Our data support mechanism (i): 2,647 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were associated with the donor at 8 dpi, while only 271 DEGs were linked to the recipient at 16 dpi. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism analyses revealed low genetic differentiation, rejecting mechanism (ii). These findings suggest that P. homocircumflexum undergoes a shift from donor-dependent to recipient-dependent gene expression, likely driven by epigenetic regulation and transcriptional plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.