Evidence mapPaperPMID 40889093Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2026

Colchicine for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cumulative-Dose Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials including 31,397 Subjects Worldwide.

Hoi-Ying Li, Joseph Cheriyan, Tsz-Kwan Chan, Kai-Hang Yiu, Hung-Fat Tse, Ian B Wilkinson, Yap-Hang Chan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hoi-Ying LiDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, K1927C, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Joseph CheriyanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Tsz-Kwan ChanDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, K1927C, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kai-Hang YiuDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, K1927C, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hung-Fat TseDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, K1927C, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China. hftse@hku.hk.
Ian B WilkinsonDivision of Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, University of Cambridge, ACCI Level 3, Hills Road, Box 128, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. ibw20@cam.ac.uk.
Yap-Hang ChanDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, K1927C, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China. chanwill@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-8468

Funding

Doris Zimmern HKU-Cambridge Hughes Hall Fellowship 2024/25Hong Kong Research Grants Council Clinical Research Fellowship 2024/25Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund 17108523Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund GRF 17110122Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation Fellowship 2022Seed Funding for Basic Research and Start-Up Funding, The University of Hong Kong 104006735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColchicine has been incorporated into major clinical guidelines for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, recent randomized trials have presented contradictory results.

objectiveWe aimed to synthesize the current evidence on colchicine in secondary CVD protection, using a cumulative-dose approach.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis incorporating all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) globally. RCTs directly comparing colchicine versus placebo/standard care for the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular or coronary vascular disease were included. Odds ratios (OR) were derived for the primary outcome, defined as the prospective occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included mortality, individual components of MACE, C-reactive protein, and adverse effects.

resultsIn total, 14 RCTs including 31,397 participants were included. Colchicine significantly reduced MACE (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.94) in both acute atherothrombotic CVD and all CVD (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60-0.86) and resulted in significant prospective reductions in C-reactive protein. The threshold effect was apparent, with a protective benefit of colchicine against MACE at higher cumulative exposure ≥ 90 mg-days (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84). Colchicine resulted in no differences in cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular mortality.

conclusionsColchicine significantly reduces MACE in both acute atherothrombotic and all CVD across multiple ethnicities, with a threshold protective effect that clinically corresponds to treatment with 0.5 mg daily for at least 6 months. Importantly, there was no signal of increased all-cause mortality. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO identifier no. CRD420251003142.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesColchicineSecondary PreventionC-Reactive ProteinDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicColchicineC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID40889093
PMCPMC12779708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.