ArticleNucleic acids research2025
An interpretable and adaptive autoencoder for efficient tissue deconvolution.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deconvolution models are a powerful tool for extracting cell-type-specific information from bulk gene expression profiles. Current methods leverage advanced machine learning models and high-resolution sequencing, like single-cell RNA-sequencing, showing promising results across diverse tissues and conditions. However, they still present important limitations: First, many depend on selecting a robust reference, which can strongly affect the deconvolution. Second, pseudobulk data used for training and real bulk RNA-seq samples often exhibit strong distribution shifts, which are currently unaccounted for. Finally, most deconvolution approaches behave as black boxes, which can compromise the reliability of the results. Here, we present Sweetwater, an adaptive and interpretable autoencoder that efficiently deconvolves bulk samples leveraging multiple classes of reference data. Moreover, we propose an improved way of generating training data from a mixture of FACS-sorted FASTQ files, reducing platform-specific biases and outperforming current single-cell-based references. Furthermore, we introduce a gold standard dataset to facilitate fair and accurate evaluation of deconvolution approaches. Finally, we demonstrate that Sweetwater adapts effectively to deconvolved samples during training, uncovering biologically meaningful patterns and enhancing result's reliability. Sweetwater is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29609180, and we anticipate it will expedite the accurate examination of high-throughput clinical data across diverse applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.