Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40889349›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Host Traits Impact the Outcome of Metagenomic Library Preparation From Dental Calculus Samples Across Diverse Mammals.

Markella Moraitou, John L Richards, Chanah Bolyos, Konstantina Saliari, Emmanuel Gilissen, Zena Timmons, Andrew C Kitchener, Olivier S G Pauwels, Richard Sabin, Phaedra Kokkini and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Markella MoraitouInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-5920
John L RichardsInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-1580
Chanah BolyosInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Konstantina SaliariNatural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-0756
Emmanuel GilissenRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium.
Zena TimmonsDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew C KitchenerDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Olivier S G PauwelsRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium.
Richard SabinNatural History Museum London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-7596
Phaedra KokkiniNatural History Museum London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-0956
Roberto Portela MiguezNatural History Museum London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3094-9949
Katerina GuschanskiInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-5457

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2019-00275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental calculus metagenomics has emerged as a valuable tool for studying the oral microbiomes of humans and a few select mammals. With increasing interest in wild animal microbiomes, it is important to understand how widely this material can be used across the mammalian tree of life, refine the related protocols and understand the expected outcomes and potential challenges of dental calculus sample processing. In this study, we significantly expand the breadth of studied host species, analysing laboratory and bioinformatics metadata of dental calculus samples from 32 ecologically and phylogenetically diverse mammals. Although we confirm the presence of an oral microbiome signature in the metagenomes of all studied mammals, the fraction recognised as oral varies between host species, possibly because of both biological differences and methodological biases. The overall success rate of dental calculus processing, from extractions to sequencing, was ~74%. Although input sample weight was positively associated with the number of produced library molecules, we identify a negative impact of enzymatic inhibition on the library preparation protocol. The inhibition was most prevalent in herbivores and frugivores and is likely diet-derived. In contrast, hosts with an animalivore diet posed fewer challenges during laboratory processing and yielded more DNA relative to sample weight. Our results translate into recommendations for future studies of dental calculus metagenomics from a variety of host species, identifying required sample amounts, and emphasising the utility of dental calculus in exploring the oral microbiome in relation to broader ecological and evolutionary questions.

Indexed as

Dental CalculusGene LibraryMammalsMetagenomicsMicrobiotaAnimalsComputational BiologyMetagenomeancient DNAlibrary preparationmuseum collectionsoral microbiomeshotgun sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40889349
PMCPMC12550474

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.