ArticleScientific reports2025
Computer vision based efficient segmentation and classification of multi brain tumor using computed tomography images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in brain tumor diagnosis and surgical planning: Recent advances.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to highlight the effectiveness of computer vision (CV) techniques in classifying brain tumors using a comprehensive dataset consisting of computed tomography (CT) scans. The proposed framework comprises six types of brain tumors, including benign tumors (Meningioma, Schwannoma, and Neurofibromatosis) and malignant tumors (Glioma, Chondrosarcoma, and Chordoma). The acquired images underwent pre-processing steps to enhance the dataset's quality, including noise reduction through median and Gaussian filters and region of interest (ROIs) extraction using an automated binary threshold-based fuzzy c-means segmentation (ABTFCS) approach. A total of 900 CT-scan images were utilized, 150 images per tumor class, each with a size of 512 × 512 pixels, and 4 ROIs taken per image, so the total dataset size is 3600 (900 × 4) attributes. After pre-processing, the dataset was further analysed to extract 135 statistical multi-features for each ROI. An optimized set of 12 statistical multi-features was selected to identify the most relevant features using a feature selection technique based on correlation. For the classification stage, the optimized statistical multi-feature dataset was evaluated using five computer vision classifiers: multilayer perceptron (MLP), BayesNet, PART, random tree, and randomizable filtered classifier, employing a 10-fold cross-validation method. Among these classifiers, MLP with fine-tuned hyperparameters achieved a promising accuracy rate of 97.83%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.