ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid q-rung linear diophantine fuzzy WASPAS approach for artificial intelligence algorithm selection in physical education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in physical education (PE) has led to an urgent need to develop robust methodologies that can be used to choose the most suitable algorithms in uncertain and vague environments. This paper introduces a new hybrid decision-making (DM) model that incorporates the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) technique into the q-rung linear Diophantine fuzzy set (q-RLDFS) framework. The primary objective is to address the gap in the lack of structured and uncertainty-resistant methods for assessing AI models based on multiple, frequently conflicting criteria in the domain of PE. The proposed model presents a two-layer framework, where the WASPAS method enables a flexible scoring system by combining both the weighted sum model (WSM) and the weighted product model (WPM). On the other hand, the q-RLDFS framework facilitates high-order fuzzy modelling and accounts for hesitation in expert ratings, thereby making the decision results more interpretable and robust. To determine the effectiveness of the model, five AI algorithms named convolutional neural network-based motion analysis (CNN-MA), reinforcement learning based training optimizer (RL-TO), expert system for exercise prescription (ES-EP), hybrid AI tutor with natural language processing (HAI-NLP), and wearable sensor data mining algorithm (WSDMA) are evaluated against eight key criteria relevant to PE. Results revealed that CNN-MA is the most effective solution to implement, followed by RL-TO. The sensitivity and comparative analysis are thoroughly conducted to determine the validity of the model in terms of its robustness and reliability. The research offers distinct practical implications and actionable recommendations to educators, administrators, and policymakers, informing the strategic implementation of AI technologies within the PE domain. In general, the research makes a significant contribution to the adoption of AI in PE, as it provides a scalable, transparent, and practically applicable decision-support model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.