ArticleScientific reports2025
Thrombus enhancement as a predictor of embolic in acute basilar artery occlusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thrombus enhancement sign (TES) is a potential imaging biomarker for differentiating embolic large vessel occlusion (embo-LVO) from intracranial atherosclerosis-related LVO (ICAS-LVO) in basilar artery occlusion (BAO). This study evaluates the association between TES and BAO etiology and its predictive value in distinguishing embo-LVO from ICAS-LVO. We conducted a prospective, two-center cohort study of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with BAO who underwent EVT between January 2020 and September 2024. TES was assessed using thin-section maximum intensity projection (TS-MIP) CTA. Patients were classified as embo-LVO or ICAS-LVO based on post-EVT angiography. Logistic regression, receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and DeLong test were used to assess TES's diagnostic accuracy. Among 107 patients, TES was detected in 56.1% (60/107). TES was significantly more frequent in embo-LVO (85.2%) than in ICAS-LVO (17.4%) (p < 0.001). TES significantly associated with embo-LVO (OR, 16.136; 95% CI 4.672-55.733; p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of TES for embo-LVO was 0.839, outperforming distal BAO (AUC = 0.714, p = 0.02). Combining TES with distal BAO improved predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.883). TES is a reliable marker for identifying embo-LVO in BAO and enhancing endovascular treatment strategies for AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.