Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890842›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Key stakeholders' perspectives on implementation of risk-based population breast cancer screening in Australia - "We can either get on the bus or get under it".

Jocelyn Lippey, Louise Keogh, Stephanie Best, Rebecca Purvis, Gregory Bruce Mann, Laura Forrest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jocelyn LippeyDepartment of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, 44 Victoria Pde, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia. Jocelyn.lippey@unimelb.edu.au.
Louise KeoghMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Stephanie BestMelbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Rebecca PurvisSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia.
Gregory Bruce MannDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Laura ForrestSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia.

Funding

Royal Australian College of Surgeons (RACS) Herbert and Gloria Kees ScholarshipVictorian Cancer Agency MCRF 20012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk-based breast cancer screening would be a dramatic shift from the current one-size-fits-all model to a tailored approach where screening modality and frequency is directed by individual risk. This project assesses what key stakeholders, defined as those holding managerial and decision-making roles within BreastScreen, consider the issues are with implementing a risk-based approach to screening.

methodsA qualitative approach was undertaken, recruiting participants through professional networks with interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants were key stakeholders defined as those managing, overseeing and influencing Breast Screen throughout Australia. Data were deductively coded against a CFIR-informed codebook, followed by content analysis per CFIR domain.

resultsTwenty interviews were conducted with 21 participants. 144 initial codes consolidated into 17 final themes. Key stakeholders are supportive and optimistic about risk-based screening in principle; however several issues exist, including knowledge gaps precluding support of evidence-based implementation. Concerns about worsening inequities within screening, cost and communication with clients are major issues key stakeholders consider important to address in the planning and implementing a change to the program.

conclusionsKey stakeholders in Australia were overwhelmingly enthusiastic about the benefits of a risk-based approach however there are concerns about risk assessment utility, cost and the potential risk to equity in the program. Systematic assessment of these concerns will be required to facilitate successful change to the well-established breast screening program in Australia should risk-stratification be undertaken.

Indexed as

Breast screeningImplementation sciencePopulation screeningRisk adjusted screeningRisk-based breast screeningRisk tailored screening

Identifiers

PMID40890842
PMCPMC12400751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.