Trial reportBMC research notes2025
Recruitment, retention and recouperation: lessons learned from a study aimed at assessing burnout mitigation in physician learners.
Trial report in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) compared to virtual body mapping (VBM) on reducing burnout symptoms. The recruitment and data collection for this study took place between May 2023 – May 2024. PLs were randomized into either ACT or VBM. Baseline and post-intervention measures included the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI tx-1), Centers of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II). Descriptive statistics were calculated.
resultsOf 58 enrolled participants, 13 completed the study (23% completion). Descriptive results suggest that PLs in ACT saw improvement in the average scores for STAI tx-1, CES-D, and AAQ-II. PLs in VBM saw improvement in the average score for the MBI, PSS-10, STAI, CES-D, BRCS, and AAQ-II. Barriers to recruitment and retention affected the study’s success, resulting in modifications to the recruitment strategy, study protocol, and data analysis. Insights from this study offer researchers an opportunity to improve the design of future work involving PLs. Studies involving PLs should consider integrating participation into clinical schedules and ensuring funding to support recruitment and retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.