Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890875›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2025

Sepsis in burn care: incidence and outcomes.

Diana Julia Tedesco, Maria Fernanda Hutter, Fadi Khalaf, Zachary Ricciuti, Marc G Jeschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Current applications and prospects of artificial intelligence in burn diagnosis and treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Longitudinal biomarker trajectories and their prognostic utility for 21-day mortality in burn patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana Julia TedescoDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Maria Fernanda HutterCentre for Burn Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Fadi KhalafDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Zachary RicciutiCentre for Burn Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Marc G JeschkeDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. jeschke@hhsc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-1664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough sepsis is known to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adult burn patients, its epidemiology and impact are poorly understood. This study aims to address these gaps by further characterizing predictors of sepsis and comparing outcomes between septic and non-septic burn patients in different age groups.

methodsWe included patients (≥ 18 years) with thermal burn injuries ≥ 5% total body surface area (TBSA) admitted to two burn centers between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2021, and 1 January 2023 and 6 April 2025. Patients were stratified by age into adults (18-59 years) and older adults (≥ 60 years), and by diagnosis of sepsis during hospitalization (sepsis vs. control). Demographics, injury characteristics, mortality, and in-hospital complications were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of sepsis and mortality among septic patients.

resultsThis study included a total of 1465 patients, including 1094 adults and 371 older adults. Sepsis was diagnosed in 20.1% of adult burn patients, with a median onset at 10 d following injury. Increasing age, greater TBSA, and inhalation injury were identified as significant risk factors for sepsis. Among patients who developed sepsis, earlier onset and female sex were associated with an elevated risk of mortality. In older adults, the incidence of sepsis was 22.9%, with a median onset at 11 d post-burn. The odds of sepsis diagnosis increased with higher TBSA and the presence of inhalation injury. Earlier sepsis onset was associated with increased mortality in older adults.

conclusionsSepsis represents a significant clinical challenge in burn patients, with age, TBSA, inhalation injury, and comorbidities significantly influencing its incidence and outcomes. Notably, early sepsis onset and female sex are associated with increased mortality, highlighting the need for advanced monitoring, prompt interventions, and the exploration of innovative sex-specific strategies to optimize outcomes in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

BurnsSepsisAdolescentAdultAgedBurn UnitsFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBurnFemaleInfectionMortalitySepsisTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40890875
PMCPMC12403279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.