ArticleClinical transplantation2025
A Comprehensive Assessment of Plasma CXCL9 and CXCL10 in Improving Clinical Prediction Models for Kidney Allograft Rejection.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers related to immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplantation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- DDR2 expression on circulating lymphocytes and monocytes associates with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Plasma CXCL9 and CXCL10 in Improving Clinical Prediction Models for Kidney Allograft Rejection.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemokine levels may predict kidney graft rejection. This study evaluated whether adding early plasma chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) or chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 10 (CXCL10) measurements to a standard-of-care model improves the prediction of the need for antirejection treatment and helps guide biopsy decisions. The benchmark model used recipient and donor age, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and dialysis need in the first 3 days after transplantation. Plasma CXCL9 or CXCL10 was added, and the extended models were evaluated using likelihood ratio tests (LRTs), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), flexible calibration curves, and net benefit analysis. Model internal validation was performed through bootstrapping. Among 163 consecutively transplanted recipients on standard immunosuppression, 43 (26.4%) required antirejection therapy between Days 3 and 21 posttransplant. The chemokine-extended models outperformed the benchmark (LRT p < 0.01), increasing discriminative ability (delta ROC-AUC of 0.02) and improving calibration. Across the range of risk thresholds for biopsy, the extended models provided better clinical utility, resulting in up to 17 fewer unnecessary biopsies per 100 patients. These findings suggest that adding plasma CXCL9 or CXCL10 to a benchmark model can improve patient care by reducing the number of biopsies in individuals unlikely to require antirejection therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.