ReviewBioanalysis2025
Overcoming target interference in bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay by optimizing sample treatment.
Review in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ADA assays for high-dose biologics: redefining drug tolerance through clinical insights.Bioanalysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug bridging immunoassays are widely employed as the standard approach for detecting anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in the development of new biological entities. A major challenge in these assays is mitigating target interference, particularly when the soluble target exists in dimeric forms, which can result in false positive signals and compromise assay specificity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe developed sensitive and robust ADA assays capable of overcoming target interference to detect antibodies against BI X in both cynomolgus monkey (cyno) plasma and human serum matrices. This was achieved through the implementation of simple sample treatment techniques, specifically, acidification using a panel of different acids, to disrupt dimeric target interactions and minimize the interference.
resultsOptimization of the acid dissociation and subsequent neutralization steps significantly reduced target interference in both cyno and human matrices. These improvements were achieved without the need for additional assay development or complex depletion strategies.
conclusionsCompared to previously reported methods for mitigating target interference, the acid panel treatment approach is simpler, more time-efficient, and cost-effective. This user-friendly strategy can be readily applied to eliminate soluble dimeric targets during ADA method development, particularly in cases where alternative methodologies are not feasible or applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.