Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892209›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2025

Enhancing the quantification of post-occlusive reactive hyperemia: a multimodal optical approach.

Henrique Silva, Carlota Rezendes, Pedro Contreiras Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henrique SilvaResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal. henrique.silva@edu.ulisboa.pt.
Carlota RezendesDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Health Technologies, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro Contreiras PintoResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) is a physiological response marked by a transient increase in microvascular perfusion following ischemia. While cutaneous perfusion during PORH has been extensively characterized using optical approaches such as Doppler-based techniques, low-cost alternatives like photoplethysmography (PPG), videocapillaroscopy (VC) and near-infrared reflectance imaging (NIRI) may provide complementary insights into both microvascular and venous dynamics. However, their role in quantifying PORH remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of low-magnification VC and NIRI-based imaging for quantifying perfusion changes during a standardized PORH protocol in healthy subjects, using PPG as a reference. Fourteen participants (21.5 ± 4.2 years) underwent suprasystolic occlusion of a randomly selected upper limb, with simultaneous recordings using PPG and VC at the finger and NIRI at the dorsal hand veins. The protocol included a 5-min baseline, 3-min occlusion (200 mmHg), and 5-min recovery. Skin blood flow was derived from the PPG signal, a hemoglobin index (C

Indexed as

HyperemiaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMicrocirculationMicroscopic AngioscopyPhotoplethysmographyRegional Blood FlowSkinSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung AdultContralateral responseNear-infrared reflectance imagingPhotoplethysmographyPost-occlusive reactive hyperemiaVein finderVideocapillaroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40892209
PMCPMC12420749

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.