ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Differentiation of benign and malignant oral lesions through surface texture analysis and SVM modeling.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and its application in early oral cancer screening: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic potential of surface texture features extracted from clinical images in objectively differentiating benign from malignant oral lesions, and to validate classification performance of a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model using these features. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 275 intraoral photographs of oral mucosal lesions with biopsy-confirmed diagnoses, sourced from both institutional archives and a public dataset. Lesion areas were manually annotated and converted into 3D surface plots to extract grayscale-based texture features. Eight statistical descriptors-mean, mode, median, variance, skewness, kurtosis, coefficient of variation (CoV), and entropy-were computed and normalized relative to adjacent healthy mucosa. Group differences were analyzed using MANOVA and effect size metrics (Cohen's d, eta squared). A support vector machine (SVM) with a Gaussian kernel was trained using five-fold cross-validation to classify lesions as benign or malignant based on the extracted features.
resultsStatistical analysis revealed significant differences between benign and malignant groups for all features except skewness (p < 0.001). Entropy, kurtosis, and CoV showed the largest effect sizes, with entropy notably higher in malignant lesions and kurtosis higher in benign ones. The SVM model achieved a sensitivity of 99.2%, specificity of 81.4%, overall accuracy of 90.5%, and an AUC of 0.939, demonstrating high diagnostic performance in distinguishing malignant from benign oral mucosal lesions based on surface texture analysis.
conclusionsSurface texture features, particularly entropy and kurtosis, offer promising diagnostic indicators for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions. SVM classifier demonstrated robust performance using these parameters. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights surface texture as an objective, underexplored diagnostic parameter. Integrating surface topography into clinical assessments and AI-based tools may enhance early detection and diagnostic accuracy in oral cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40892273What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.