Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893122›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Whole-Workflow Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via a Two-Step Access Method: Technical Report and Preliminary Results.

Wenjie Zheng, Junlong Wu, Wen Xia, Rui Zuo, Xian Chang, Hong Yin, Changqing Li, Chao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenjie Zheng *Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Junlong Wu *Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Wen Xia *Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Rui ZuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xian ChangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Hong YinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Changqing LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The spinal surgery robot can provide precise preoperative or intraoperative surgical planning and guide the implementation of the surgical plan under real-time navigation monitoring. Researchers have recently begun exploring the use of robotic systems to assist in performing Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD). However, prior studies have primarily focused on robotic-assisted transforaminal puncture. In this study, we establish a two-step cannulation surgical workflow using specialized instruments to facilitate the whole-process robotic-assisted PELD. Patients and Methods: In this study, 14 patients with lumbar disc herniations were enrolled to undergo PELD assisted by a robotic system. Preoperative CT images were registered in the navigation system for surgical planning. The whole procedure was performed under spinal robotic guidance, including puncture, dilation, foraminoplasty, and working tube placement. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate its feasibility and safety, as well as to summarize the surgical workflow. Results: All patients successfully completed the robotic-assisted PELD surgery. The average robot preparation time was 31.42±6.45 minutes, the cannula placement time was 9.85±2.59 minutes, and the mean operative time was 92.21±18.65 minutes. The average number of intraoperative fluoroscopy shots was 3.35±0.84. Postoperative follow-up showed significant improvement in back pain/leg pain VAS scores and ODI scores compared with preoperative values. According to the modified Macnab criteria, 8 cases were rated as excellent (57.1%), and 6 cases as good (42.9%), resulting in an overall satisfaction rate of 100%. No patients experienced severe complications such as nerve root injury or deep infection. Conclusion: Robotic assistance in PELD surgery ensures a precise preoperative planning and safe implementation, also reducing radiation exposure both patients and surgeons. With specialized instruments, the two-step access method simplifies PELD as a safe and effective surgery.

Indexed as

lumbar disc herniationnavigationPELDpercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomyrobotic assistancespinal surgery robot

Identifiers

PMID40893122
PMCPMC12396528

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.