ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Whole-Workflow Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via a Two-Step Access Method: Technical Report and Preliminary Results.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a disease-specific bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Global research hotspots and emerging trends in orthopedic robotic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interventional Radiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The spinal surgery robot can provide precise preoperative or intraoperative surgical planning and guide the implementation of the surgical plan under real-time navigation monitoring. Researchers have recently begun exploring the use of robotic systems to assist in performing Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD). However, prior studies have primarily focused on robotic-assisted transforaminal puncture. In this study, we establish a two-step cannulation surgical workflow using specialized instruments to facilitate the whole-process robotic-assisted PELD. Patients and Methods: In this study, 14 patients with lumbar disc herniations were enrolled to undergo PELD assisted by a robotic system. Preoperative CT images were registered in the navigation system for surgical planning. The whole procedure was performed under spinal robotic guidance, including puncture, dilation, foraminoplasty, and working tube placement. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate its feasibility and safety, as well as to summarize the surgical workflow. Results: All patients successfully completed the robotic-assisted PELD surgery. The average robot preparation time was 31.42±6.45 minutes, the cannula placement time was 9.85±2.59 minutes, and the mean operative time was 92.21±18.65 minutes. The average number of intraoperative fluoroscopy shots was 3.35±0.84. Postoperative follow-up showed significant improvement in back pain/leg pain VAS scores and ODI scores compared with preoperative values. According to the modified Macnab criteria, 8 cases were rated as excellent (57.1%), and 6 cases as good (42.9%), resulting in an overall satisfaction rate of 100%. No patients experienced severe complications such as nerve root injury or deep infection. Conclusion: Robotic assistance in PELD surgery ensures a precise preoperative planning and safe implementation, also reducing radiation exposure both patients and surgeons. With specialized instruments, the two-step access method simplifies PELD as a safe and effective surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.