ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli from various clinical sources.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proposed Risk of Bias Assessment Tool forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Disarming Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens: Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Induced Plasmid Curing for the Reversal of Resistance and Virulence inInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aim: The purpose of the study was to identify the frequency and three susceptibilities of Materials and methods: Using a multi-center approach, this retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed the results of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates from urine, wound swabs, and sputum samples. The study covered the period from January 2023 to December 2023 and included all public and private hospitals in the Jazan region. Results: The majority of isolates were derived from urine samples in 1161 patients (85.49%), followed by pus in 123 patients (9.06%) and sputum in 74 patients (5.45%). There were high sensitivity rates to Amikacin, Tigecycline, and Imipenem by (97.49%), (90.87%), and (90.35%), respectively, while there were high resistance rates to Norfloxacin, Ampicillin, and Cefotaxime by (93.67%), (79.60%), and (71.65%), respectively. Conclusion: There was considerable resistance to commonly used antibiotics among
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.