Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893344›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

The inTouch Integrated Care Framework - Reimagining Integrated Health Service Delivery.

Kathy Eljiz, Jo Medlin, Ben Harris-Roxas, Jasmin Ellis, Alison Derrett, Graeme Loy, David Greenfield

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathy EljizHealth Services Research Unit, School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-1888
Jo MedlinIntegrated and Community Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, AU.
Ben Harris-RoxasSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, AU.
Jasmin EllisIntegrated and Community Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, AU.
Alison DerrettWestern Sydney Local Health District, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0901-5391
Graeme LoyWestern Sydney Local Health District, AU.
David GreenfieldSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-6025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Integrated care has been adopted as a guiding principle to reduce fragmentation and to make health systems more person-centred. Successful integration requires care services and processes that include primary care, specialist care, and acute services. To promote learning and development in the field, flexible and adaptable empirically derived frameworks for different contexts, conditions and settings are required. Description: The Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD) inTouch Program is a systems approach to reconceptualising service delivery, focusing on integrating systems components, platforms for service delivery and coordinating care planning for improved care delivery. The inTouch Program key features and core elements, and three care pathways are presented, demonstrating the adaptability for different population cohorts. Discussion: The inTouch Program, and each pathway, embodies an ongoing, dynamic response to patient priorities. Informed by bottom-up stakeholder input from staff, consumers, and care providers, each pathway fosters interorganisational collaboration by facilitating coproduction of care across primary, aged, and community care sectors, as well as hospitals. The analysis derives an inTouch Integrated Care Framework consisting of six core elements, four strategy and governance enablers, and operational components required for practical implementation and sustainability of pathways. Together they operationalise and link diverse health and social care organisations into a living continuum of care. Conclusion: Accounting for nuances in organisational and care settings, is the difference between success and failure for integrated care. The exploration of the inTouch program and three pathways has detailed how to deliver care for different patient cohorts across health and social care settings. The three care pathways demonstrate the viability and necessity to pursue collaboration, cooperation and care navigation, whilst tailoring services to specific contexts and stakeholder needs. inTouch program aims to ensure safe, high quality patient care is delivered across health and social settings, prioritising the patient needs.

Indexed as

acuteaged carecommunityintegrated care frameworkprimary healthsystems approach

Identifiers

PMID40893344
PMCPMC12396184

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.