ReviewNational science review2025
Recent progress and future prospects of the early solar system chronology.
Review in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in geochronology: not only timing, but also rate.National science review · 2025Article
- Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Time Constraints from Small Bodies and the Lifetime of Reservoirs in the Solar Protoplanetary Disk.Space science reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We review the developments in isotope chronology of the oldest extraterrestrial materials achieved in the last 10-15 years, with emphasis on high precision U-Pb and extinct radionuclide dating, and on application of these methods to the materials that formed in the first 7 million years after formation of proto-Sun, the time during which the gas and dust in the protoplanetary disc accreted or dissipated, and planetesimals and protoplanets formed. The analytical precision of isotopic dates now allows resolving events that occurred within 100 000-300 000 years of each other. The main challenges currently faced by isotope cosmochronology are matching the achieved precision with a similar level of accuracy, adapting to the growing evidence of complex isotope heterogeneity of the protoplanetary disc, extracting ages of individual events from complex rocks, and responding to growing quantity, quality and diversity of recently discovered meteorites and samples returned by space missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.