Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893487›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Added prognostic value of histogram features from preoperative multi-modal diffusion MRI in predicting Ki-67 proliferation for adult-type diffuse gliomas.

Yingqian Huang, Siyuan He, Hangtong Hu, Hui Ma, Zihuan Huang, Shanmei Zeng, Liwei Mazu, Wenwen Zhou, Chen Zhao, Nengjin Zhu and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06572592 (The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Multi-model Diffusion MRI in Predicting Ki-67 Proliferation for Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06572592 not yet recruitingnot on this map

The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Multi-model Diffusion MRI in Predicting Ki-67 Proliferation for Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas

TypeobservationalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled200ConditionsGlioma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yingqian Huang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Siyuan He *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hangtong Hu *Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui MaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zihuan HuangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shanmei ZengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liwei MazuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenwen ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen ZhaoMR Research Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers, Guangzhou, China.
Nengjin ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajing WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiuchan LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiyun YangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoping Shen *Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Nu Zhang *Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianping Chu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ki-67 labelling index (LI), a critical marker of tumor proliferation, is vital for grading adult-type diffuse gliomas and predicting patient survival. However, its accurate assessment currently relies on invasive biopsy or surgical resection. This makes it challenging to non-invasively predict Ki-67 LI and subsequent prognosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether histogram analysis of multi-parametric diffusion model metrics-specifically diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)-could help predict Ki-67 LI in adult-type diffuse gliomas and further predict patient survival. Methods: A total of 123 patients with diffuse gliomas who underwent preoperative bipolar spin-echo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Diffusion metrics (DTI, DKI and NODDI) and their histogram features were extracted and used to develop a nomogram model in the training set (n=86), and the performance was verified in the test set (n=37). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the nomogram model was calculated. The outcome cohort, including 123 patients, was used to evaluate the predictive value of the diffusion nomogram model for overall survival (OS). Cox proportion regression was performed to predict OS. Results: Among 123 patients, 87 exhibited high Ki-67 LI (Ki-67 LI >5%). The patients had a mean age of 46.08±13.24 years, with 39 being female. Tumor grading showed 46 cases of grade 2, 21 cases of grade 3, and 56 cases of grade 4. The nomogram model included eight histogram features from diffusion MRI and showed good performance for prediction Ki-67 LI, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.98, sensitivity =0.85, specificity =0.84] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.64-0.98, sensitivity =0.77, specificity =0.73) in the training set and test set, respectively. Further nomogram incorporating these variables showed good discrimination in Ki-67 LI predicting and glioma grading. A low nomogram model score relative to the median value in the outcomes cohort was independently associated with OS (P<0.01). Conclusions: Accurate prediction of the Ki-67 LI in adult-type diffuse glioma patients was achieved by using multi-modal diffusion MRI histogram radiomics model, which also reliably and accurately determined survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06572592.

Indexed as

Gliomahistogram analysisKi-67multi-modal diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (multi-modal diffusion MRI)overall survival (OS)

Identifiers

PMID40893487
PMCPMC12397644

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.