ArticleOphthalmology science
A Generalized and Interpretable Multi-Label Multi-Disease Screening System for Ocular Anterior Segment Disease Detection.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A web-based semi-supervised deep learning platform for automated AS-OCT assessment and monitoring of infectious keratitis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Validated semi-supervised early and accurate screening for anterior segment diseases: a 3PM-guided conceptual and technological innovation.The EPMA journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a multi-label, multi-disease, well-generalized, and interpretable screening system applied to the detection of common ocular anterior segment diseases based on ocular surface slit-lamp images. Design: A multicenter artificial intelligence diagnostic study. Participants: A total of 1990 patients were randomly selected from 2 medical centers: the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University and the Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, between November 2016 and March 2022. Methods: The data set was retrospectively collected from 2 clinical centers and composed of 5132 anonymized slit-lamp images of 13 ocular anterior segment diseases. The screening system was trained and validated in the internal data set composing randomly selected phenotypes and was tested in both internal and external data sets with less trained or new phenotypes included. The performance of the model was further compared with ophthalmologists. Main Outcome Measures: The diagnostic accuracy, precision, recall, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient, confusion matrix, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. Results: The multi-label multi-disease detection ability of the screening system was evaluated in 3 stepwise levels and reached the average accuracy of 0.969 and 0.923 in binary image-level anomaly detection, 0.940 and 0.827 in the 4-class region-level anomaly detection, and 0.972 and 0.911 in the 13-class lesion-level anomaly detection in the internal and external test data sets, respectively, showing comparable performance with the ophthalmologists. Furthermore, the screening system presented the average accuracy of 0.950 and 0.852 in internal and external test data sets in images of phenotypes that were less trained or untrained. Conclusions: Our screening system showed excellent multi-label and multi-disease detection ability and generalization ability in identifying ocular anterior segment disease, regardless of the limited phenotypes in the training data set. Thus, the screening system is anticipated to offer easily available primary medical information for patients and assist ophthalmologists in clinical practice. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.