ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Multi-View Echocardiographic Embedding for Accessible AI Development.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: Echocardiography serves as a cornerstone of cardiovascular diagnostics through multiple standardized imaging views. While recent AI foundation models demonstrate superior capabilities across cardiac imaging tasks, their massive computational requirements and reliance on large-scale datasets create accessibility barriers, limiting AI development to well-resourced institutions. Vector embedding approaches offer promising solutions by leveraging compact representations from original medical images for downstream applications. Furthermore, demographic fairness remains critical, as AI models may incorporate biases that confound clinically relevant features. We developed a multi-view encoder framework to address computational accessibility while investigating demographic fairness challenges. Methods: We utilized the MIMIC-IV-ECHO dataset (7,169 echocardiographic studies) to develop a transformer-based multi-view encoder that aggregates view-level representations into study-level embeddings. The framework incorporated adversarial learning to suppress demographic information while maintaining clinical performance. We evaluated performance across 21 binary classification tasks encompassing echocardiographic measurements and clinical diagnoses, comparing against foundation model baselines with varying adversarial weights. Results: The multi-view encoder achieved a mean improvement of 9.0 AUC points (12.0% relative improvement) across clinical tasks compared to foundation model embeddings. Performance remained robust with limited echocardiographic views compared to the conventional approach. However, adversarial learning showed limited effectiveness in reducing demographic shortcuts, with stronger weighting substantially compromising diagnostic performance. Conclusions: Our framework democratizes advanced cardiac AI capabilities, enabling substantial diagnostic improvements without massive computational infrastructure. While algorithmic approaches to demographic fairness showed limitations, the multi-view encoder provides a practical pathway for broader AI adoption in cardiovascular medicine with enhanced efficiency in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.