ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
AHA's Life's Essential-8 cardiovascular health metrics and progression of coronary artery calcification in Japanese men.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The relationships between Life's Crucial 9, Life's Essential 8, and sarcopenia in older adults: multicenter case-control study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The American Heart Association's Life's Essential-8 (LE8) cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics is considered a comprehensive framework for optimal cardiovascular wellbeing. However, its relationship with the progression of subclinical atherosclerosis, like coronary artery calcification (CAC), is not clarified. We investigated the associations of LE8 CVH metrics with the prevalence and progression of CAC in Japanese men. Methods: We analyzed data from 760 asymptomatic men participating in the Shiga Epidemiological Study of Subclinical Atherosclerosis. We assessed baseline (2006-2008) LE8 CVH (low, 0-49 points; moderate, 50-79 points; high, 80-100 points) using its eight components (diet, physical activity assessed by step count, smoking, sleep, body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, blood pressure). We quantified CAC at baseline and follow-up of 5 years employing Agatston's method and defined its baseline prevalence (CAC >0) and progression (employing Berry's criteria). Modified Poisson regression analyses were used to estimate risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI), adjusted for age and family history of cardiovascular disease. Results: Participants (mean [SD] age, 63.8 [9.4] years) had 63.2 % and 44.9 % prevalence of CAC at baseline and CAC progression at follow-up, respectively. Individuals with moderate and low CVH at baseline had a higher risk of prevalent CAC (RR [95 % CI], 1.42 [1.18-1.71] and 2.07 [1.67-2.57], respectively) at baseline, compared to those with high CVH. Those with moderate and low CVH at baseline had a higher risk of CAC progression (RR [95 % CI], 1.52 [1.17-1.97] and 1.99 [1.42-2.81], respectively), compared to high CVH individuals. Conclusions: A lower LE8 CVH is significantly associated with a higher risk of prevalence and progression of CAC in general Japanese men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.