ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Development and validation of a deep-learning algorithm for rule-in and rule-out coronary artery disease based on electrocardiogram without evidence of myocardial ischemia.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of Artificial Intelligence Prediction of Epicardial Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current coronary artery disease (CAD) guidelines recommend to rule-out or rule-in patients for further examination by assessing a pretest probability (PTP) ≤ 5 % or ≥ 15 %. We developed and validated a deep-learning algorithm for rule-in or rule-out based on electrocardiogram (ECG) without myocardial ischemia evidence. Methods: Between October 2019 and June 2022, data from two centers (Fuwai Hospital [Beijing] and Yunnan Fuwai Hospital) of CAD-suspected patients undergoing either coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography were used. Data from the Fuwai Hospital (Beijing) were used to train (randomly 90 %) and internally validate (randomly 10 %) a deep-learning algorithm to detect CAD (≥ 70 % stenosis) based on 12-lead ECGs. An algorithm-based decision-making protocol was established for rule-out or rule-in based on a predefined threshold allowing for a 95 % negative predictive value (NPV). Data from the Yunnan Fuwai Hospital were used to externally validate the performance of the decision-making protocol. The CAD prevalence was calculated in patients who were recommended to rule-in or rule-out. Results: In internal validation set, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.81 and the CAD prevalence of patients who were recommended rule-out and rule-in were 5 % (40/790) and 23 % (527/2253), respectively. In external validation set, the CAD prevalence of patients who were recommended rule-out and rule-in were 0 % (0/661) and 15 % (255/1699), respectively. Conclusions: Our algorithm based on ECG without myocardial ischemia evidence performed good in CAD detection. An algorithm-based decision-making protocol could achieve the guideline-recommended performance in guiding rule-out or rule-in for further examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.